<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BULLETS, BROADS, BLACKMAIL &amp; BOMBS &gt;&gt; Swords, Sorcery, Sandals &amp; Slave Girls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/bullets-broads-blackmail-bombs-swords-sorcery-sandals-slave-girls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/bullets-broads-blackmail-bombs-swords-sorcery-sandals-slave-girls/</link>
	<description>reading material to get excited about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:56:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WEEKEND REGASM &#62;&#62; 11.19.06 &#187; Bookgasm</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/bullets-broads-blackmail-bombs-swords-sorcery-sandals-slave-girls/comment-page-1/#comment-6108</link>
		<dc:creator>WEEKEND REGASM &#62;&#62; 11.19.06 &#187; Bookgasm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=953#comment-6108</guid>
		<description>[...] Reading through The New York Times’ Sunday Book Review today, I can’t help but draw comparisons between that venerable institution and our humble (but better) site. Really, what would you rather read: an overlong look Allen Ginsberg’s life and work, or Bruce Grossman’s savaging of L. Ron Hubbard’s SLAVES OF SLEEP? (This week was like Christmas, Halloween and President&#8217;s Day combined for L. Ron followers, but Grossman just doesn’t care. He’s that much of a badass.) Sure, the NYT reviewed books about SCREW magazine, Alice Denham’s sexual romp through the 1950s literary scene and Charles Bukowski, but SHANNA, THE SHE-DEVIL is strangely absent. What a bunch of stuffed shirts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reading through The New York Times’ Sunday Book Review today, I can’t help but draw comparisons between that venerable institution and our humble (but better) site. Really, what would you rather read: an overlong look Allen Ginsberg’s life and work, or Bruce Grossman’s savaging of L. Ron Hubbard’s SLAVES OF SLEEP? (This week was like Christmas, Halloween and President&#8217;s Day combined for L. Ron followers, but Grossman just doesn’t care. He’s that much of a badass.) Sure, the NYT reviewed books about SCREW magazine, Alice Denham’s sexual romp through the 1950s literary scene and Charles Bukowski, but SHANNA, THE SHE-DEVIL is strangely absent. What a bunch of stuffed shirts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

