<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Dirt Cheap Tadalafil - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/anathem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/anathem/</link>
	<description>reading material to get excited about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Dirt Cheap Tadalafil - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-57293</link>
		<dc:creator>BruceR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=5294#comment-57293</guid>
		<description>As others have noted, Anathem certainly isn&#039;t a &quot;casual read&quot;. It takes some work and not a small amount of patience (I think it took me about a week to get through the first 200 pages, and 2 days for the last 700). Having said that, I have found it to be one of the best books I&#039;ve read in the last couple of years. In fact, once I had read through it the first time, I immediately spent 2 days rereading it. There&#039;s a lot of subtlety that doesn&#039;t come through on the first reading (and I didn&#039;t &quot;cheat&quot; by referring to the dictionary in the appendices the first time through). It certainly won&#039;t satisfy everyone (unlike &quot;Snow crash&quot;, which gets more relevant every time I read it - it&#039;ll soon have to be reclassifed as non-fiction), but I highly recommend it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others have noted, Anathem certainly isn&#8217;t a &#8220;casual read&#8221;. It takes some work and not a small amount of patience (I think it took me about a week to get through the first 200 pages, and 2 days for the last 700). Having said that, I have found it to be one of the best books I&#8217;ve read in the last couple of years. In fact, once I had read through it the first time, I immediately spent 2 days rereading it. There&#8217;s a lot of subtlety that doesn&#8217;t come through on the first reading (and I didn&#8217;t &#8220;cheat&#8221; by referring to the dictionary in the appendices the first time through). It certainly won&#8217;t satisfy everyone (unlike &#8220;Snow crash&#8221;, which gets more relevant every time I read it &#8211; it&#8217;ll soon have to be reclassifed as non-fiction), but I highly recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dirt Cheap Tadalafil - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-56444</link>
		<dc:creator>FraaFletcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=5294#comment-56444</guid>
		<description>Haha acpaul I think you nailed it. Patience is key. This was a killer book for me, one of the best books I&#039;ve ever read.

You need some interest in science. For me, that wasn&#039;t a prob.

You also need quite a lot of patience to learn the proper nouns that Stephenson uses extensively. At first it bugged me a bit, but then I realized: why would an alien planet call Hilbert space &quot;Hilbert space&quot;? Hilbert didn&#039;t live there! If they discovered the same concept, it would be by someone else - Fraa Hemn, hence &quot;Hemn space&quot;. As for the few names of things that aren&#039;t scientific theories like &quot;jeejah&quot;, &quot;sline&quot;, &quot;speely&quot; - there&#039;s so few of these, and they&#039;re based on Latin roots, that they are easy to remember. Aliens don&#039;t have iPhones! They have jeejahs! See? Easy ;-)

Personally, both of these things are like candy to me, I LOVED this book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha acpaul I think you nailed it. Patience is key. This was a killer book for me, one of the best books I&#8217;ve ever read.</p>
<p>You need some interest in science. For me, that wasn&#8217;t a prob.</p>
<p>You also need quite a lot of patience to learn the proper nouns that Stephenson uses extensively. At first it bugged me a bit, but then I realized: why would an alien planet call Hilbert space &#8220;Hilbert space&#8221;? Hilbert didn&#8217;t live there! If they discovered the same concept, it would be by someone else &#8211; Fraa Hemn, hence &#8220;Hemn space&#8221;. As for the few names of things that aren&#8217;t scientific theories like &#8220;jeejah&#8221;, &#8220;sline&#8221;, &#8220;speely&#8221; &#8211; there&#8217;s so few of these, and they&#8217;re based on Latin roots, that they are easy to remember. Aliens don&#8217;t have iPhones! They have jeejahs! See? Easy <img src='http://www.bookgasm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Personally, both of these things are like candy to me, I LOVED this book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dirt Cheap Tadalafil - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-56056</link>
		<dc:creator>acpaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=5294#comment-56056</guid>
		<description>I have always enjoyed long books because I read fast. I also enjoy series. I have never before read Stephenson because he normally does not appear to write in the genres I read. 
That being said, I loved Anathem. I thought it might simply be one of the best books I&#039;ve read all year. The blending of monastic life, math, science, philosophy and the real world was to me, awesome. But then, I do have the patience to sit through hundreds of pages of exposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always enjoyed long books because I read fast. I also enjoy series. I have never before read Stephenson because he normally does not appear to write in the genres I read.<br />
That being said, I loved Anathem. I thought it might simply be one of the best books I&#8217;ve read all year. The blending of monastic life, math, science, philosophy and the real world was to me, awesome. But then, I do have the patience to sit through hundreds of pages of exposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dirt Cheap Tadalafil - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-55947</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=5294#comment-55947</guid>
		<description>I stop reading a book if any of the characters hails a taxi on page 100.   Any other page is fine, but not on page 100.  That&#039;s when I stop reading.

Also, there should be no mention of Fig Newtons.  Ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stop reading a book if any of the characters hails a taxi on page 100.   Any other page is fine, but not on page 100.  That&#8217;s when I stop reading.</p>
<p>Also, there should be no mention of Fig Newtons.  Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dirt Cheap Tadalafil - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-55911</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Redekop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=5294#comment-55911</guid>
		<description>I did finish it, and no Neal Stephenson is worthless. However, I think he got bogged down on the philosophy, and the plot meandered as a result. DUNE comparisons are fair, but I&#039;ve returned to Herbert&#039;s classic many times over the years. ANATHEM, I fear, will not hold the same fascination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did finish it, and no Neal Stephenson is worthless. However, I think he got bogged down on the philosophy, and the plot meandered as a result. DUNE comparisons are fair, but I&#8217;ve returned to Herbert&#8217;s classic many times over the years. ANATHEM, I fear, will not hold the same fascination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dirt Cheap Tadalafil - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-55909</link>
		<dc:creator>RP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=5294#comment-55909</guid>
		<description>Luckily, the CD was only bundled with advance copies--purchasers of the retail edition can buy it or download the mp3s from the ANATHEM Web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily, the CD was only bundled with advance copies&#8211;purchasers of the retail edition can buy it or download the mp3s from the ANATHEM Web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dirt Cheap Tadalafil - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/sci-fi/anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-55907</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=5294#comment-55907</guid>
		<description>I guess I wasn&#039;t willing to put in the work, because I enacted the 100-page rule on this one. By then, nothing had happened. Stephenson has spent eight pages describing a clock. It was maddening.

However, I did enjoy the two baffling, math-based short stories in the appendix, one of which involves how to properly cut a cake. But you failed to mention the CD of monk chants and &quot;music&quot; that comes with the book! It is singularly awful, and probably made my reading experience worse than it otherwise would have been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I wasn&#8217;t willing to put in the work, because I enacted the 100-page rule on this one. By then, nothing had happened. Stephenson has spent eight pages describing a clock. It was maddening.</p>
<p>However, I did enjoy the two baffling, math-based short stories in the appendix, one of which involves how to properly cut a cake. But you failed to mention the CD of monk chants and &#8220;music&#8221; that comes with the book! It is singularly awful, and probably made my reading experience worse than it otherwise would have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
