<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BOOKS 2 FILM &gt;&gt; 1408</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/horror/books-2-film-1408/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/horror/books-2-film-1408/</link>
	<description>reading material to get excited about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:08:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Lott</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/horror/books-2-film-1408/comment-page-1/#comment-10149</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Lott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/horror/books-2-film-1408/#comment-10149</guid>
		<description>To be perfectly honest, I didn&#039;t remember reading the story, even though I knew I had two years ago, when I picked up EVENTUAL on the bargain bin and read it all the way through. I purposely didn&#039;t read it again until I got home from seeing the movie. The movie is pretty faithful to the first two-thirds, but adds enough stuff that I don&#039;t think you&#039;d feel like you&#039;d already seen it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be perfectly honest, I didn&#8217;t remember reading the story, even though I knew I had two years ago, when I picked up EVENTUAL on the bargain bin and read it all the way through. I purposely didn&#8217;t read it again until I got home from seeing the movie. The movie is pretty faithful to the first two-thirds, but adds enough stuff that I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;d feel like you&#8217;d already seen it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 60 in 3</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/horror/books-2-film-1408/comment-page-1/#comment-10134</link>
		<dc:creator>60 in 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/horror/books-2-film-1408/#comment-10134</guid>
		<description>Stephen King adaptations are so hit or miss.  They&#039;re either incredible (Shashank, Stand By Me and yes, even Running Man) or awful (lawnmower man, sleep walkers and all those miniseries).  Hoping this one is the former since I did like the story.

Does reading the story ruin the movie?  Or have they changed the movie enough that I will still enjoy it?

Gal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen King adaptations are so hit or miss.  They&#8217;re either incredible (Shashank, Stand By Me and yes, even Running Man) or awful (lawnmower man, sleep walkers and all those miniseries).  Hoping this one is the former since I did like the story.</p>
<p>Does reading the story ruin the movie?  Or have they changed the movie enough that I will still enjoy it?</p>
<p>Gal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

