<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marvel 1602: New World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/comics/marvel-1602-new-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/comics/marvel-1602-new-world/</link>
	<description>reading material to get excited about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:08:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookgasm &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marvel 1602: Fantastick Four</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/comics/marvel-1602-new-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10170</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookgasm &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marvel 1602: Fantastick Four</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=333#comment-10170</guid>
		<description>[...] on the basis of MARVEL 1602: NEW WORLD and even moreso the new MARVEL 1602: FANTASTICK FOUR, it&#8217;s clear this won&#8217;t be the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the basis of MARVEL 1602: NEW WORLD and even moreso the new MARVEL 1602: FANTASTICK FOUR, it&#8217;s clear this won&#8217;t be the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOUIS&#8217; SERIOUS ISSUES &#62;&#62; 2.21.07 &#187; Bookgasm</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/comics/marvel-1602-new-world/comment-page-1/#comment-6910</link>
		<dc:creator>LOUIS&#8217; SERIOUS ISSUES &#62;&#62; 2.21.07 &#187; Bookgasm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=333#comment-6910</guid>
		<description>[...] Peter David’s script is dense, replying a little too much on Elvish-speak, but Jae Lee and Richard Isanove have beautifully captured the world of the gunslinger, with the art resembling the much-loved 1602. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Peter David’s script is dense, replying a little too much on Elvish-speak, but Jae Lee and Richard Isanove have beautifully captured the world of the gunslinger, with the art resembling the much-loved 1602. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

