<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smonk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/adventure/smonk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/adventure/smonk/</link>
	<description>reading material to get excited about</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/adventure/smonk/#comment-8287</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 02:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=580#comment-8287</guid>
		<description>I did read the book and I never just skim the books. I just did not enjoy it as much as you did. As far as the last 50 pages. Thats not really a Tales From The Crypt twist since those are more gotcha type affairs. Not lets throw in a bizzare twist of sex to excite the readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did read the book and I never just skim the books. I just did not enjoy it as much as you did. As far as the last 50 pages. Thats not really a Tales From The Crypt twist since those are more gotcha type affairs. Not lets throw in a bizzare twist of sex to excite the readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/adventure/smonk/#comment-8285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 00:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=580#comment-8285</guid>
		<description>I couldn't disagree more with the review. I actually wonder if the reviewer even read the book or just skimmed over it and took DIY Cliff notes as a couple of the plot points cited as examples are completely wrong.

What I found most unique about the book is that it's a western (or "southern" if it pleases the author better) that takes a decidedly and unforseen gothic turn for the last 50 pages. It's  The Outlaw Josey Wales with a Tales From The Crypt twist. A nice surprise to say the least.

I loved Franklin's other works as well (Hell At The Breech and Poachers) and recommend this along with both of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t disagree more with the review. I actually wonder if the reviewer even read the book or just skimmed over it and took DIY Cliff notes as a couple of the plot points cited as examples are completely wrong.</p>
<p>What I found most unique about the book is that it&#8217;s a western (or &#8220;southern&#8221; if it pleases the author better) that takes a decidedly and unforseen gothic turn for the last 50 pages. It&#8217;s  The Outlaw Josey Wales with a Tales From The Crypt twist. A nice surprise to say the least.</p>
<p>I loved Franklin&#8217;s other works as well (Hell At The Breech and Poachers) and recommend this along with both of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WEEKEND REGASM &#62;&#62; 9.3.06 &#187; Bookgasm</title>
		<link>http://www.bookgasm.com/reviews/adventure/smonk/#comment-5766</link>
		<dc:creator>WEEKEND REGASM &#62;&#62; 9.3.06 &#187; Bookgasm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 21:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookgasm.com/?p=580#comment-5766</guid>
		<description>[...] We here at BOOKGASM like to review books that we are already inclined to like. It’s a philosophical thing, really. While it’s fun and easy for me to review a book about, say, gardening, just to make fun of the hobby, the end result is very little of value is passed on to people who might actually enjoy such a book. All the more sad, then, is Bruce Grossman’s assessment of Tom Franklin’s SMONK, a noirish Western that Grossman says is all about ill-conceived weirdness that never really gets under his skin. Much like this column. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We here at BOOKGASM like to review books that we are already inclined to like. It’s a philosophical thing, really. While it’s fun and easy for me to review a book about, say, gardening, just to make fun of the hobby, the end result is very little of value is passed on to people who might actually enjoy such a book. All the more sad, then, is Bruce Grossman’s assessment of Tom Franklin’s SMONK, a noirish Western that Grossman says is all about ill-conceived weirdness that never really gets under his skin. Much like this column. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
